A Nash bargaining model for simple exchange networks
نویسندگان
چکیده
Starting from exogenously given negotiation networks, sociological exchange theories explain bilateral divisions of fixed surpluses (e.g., cake, dollar) as consequences of the partners’ structural embeddedness. In accordance with the available experimental evidence, we focus on simple exchange networks and present a formal model for predicting profit splits from such structures. In contrast to other approaches, we combine the generalized Nash bargaining solution from game theory with the assumption that both relational features and network positions affect exchange outcomes. The resulting point predictions for profit splits correspond closely with experimental results obtained by Cook et al. [Cook, K.S., Emerson, R.M., Gillmore, M.R., Yamagishi, T., 1983. The distribution of power in exchange networks: theory and experimental results. American Journal of Sociology 89, 275–305], Lovaglia et al. [Lovaglia, M.J., Skvoretz, J., Willer, D., Markovsky, B., 1995. Negotiated exchanges in social networks. Social Forces 74, 123–155], Markovsky et al. [Markovsky, B., Willer, D., Patton, T., 1988. Power relations in exchange networks. American Sociological Review 53, 220–236], Simpson and Willer [Simpson, B., Willer, D., 1999. A new method for finding power structures. In: Willer, D. (Ed.), Network Exchange Theory. Praeger, Westport, CT, pp. 270–284], Skvoretz and Fararo [Skvoretz, J., Fararo, T.J., 1992. Power and network exchange: an essay toward theoretical unification. Social Networks 14, 325–344], Skvoretz and Willer [Skvoretz, J., Willer, D., 1993. Exclusion and power: a test of four theories of power in exchange networks. American Sociological Review 58, An earlier version was presented at the 1999 fall meeting of the section “Model Building and Simulation” of the German Sociological Association in Heidelberg, at a 2002 conference of The Netherlands Institute for Advanced Study in the Humanities and Social Sciences (NIAS) in Wassenaar, and in seminars at Venice International University, Utrecht University, University of Groningen, and the University of Bern. ∗ Corresponding author. E-mail addresses: [email protected] (N. Braun); [email protected] (T. Gautschi). 0378-8733/$ – see front matter © 2004 Published by Elsevier B.V. doi:10.1016/j.socnet.2004.11.011 2 N. Braun, T. Gautschi / Social Networks 28 (2006) 1–23 801–818] as well as Yamagishi et al. [Yamagishi, T., Gillmore, M.R., Cook, K.S., 1988. Network connections and the distribution of power in exchange networks. American Journal of Sociology 93, 833–851]. © 2004 Published by Elsevier B.V. JEL classification: C71; C78; C91
منابع مشابه
Bargaining dynamics in exchange networks
We consider a one-sided assignment market or exchange network with transferable utility and propose a model for the dynamics of bargaining in such a market. Our dynamical model is local, involving iterative updates of ‘offers’ based on estimated best alternative matches, in the spirit of pairwise Nash bargaining. We establish that when a balanced outcome (a generalization of the pairwise Nash b...
متن کاملA Natural Dynamics for Bargaining on Exchange Networks
Bargaining networks model the behavior of a set of players that need to reach pairwise agreements for making profits. Nash bargaining solutions are special outcomes of such games that are both stable and balanced. Kleinberg and Tardos proved a sharp algorithmic characterization of such outcomes, but left open the problem of how the actual bargaining process converges to them. A partial answer w...
متن کاملEmploying a Multi-Criteria Approach under Bankruptcy Conditions for Optimal Allocation of Shared Water Resources through Using Asymmetric Nash Bargaining Method
Management based on the flexibility, fairness, and sustainability characteristics of water resources may play a key role in preventing the continuation of the crisis process as well as reducing water users’ conflict. In the present research, the framework for the optimal allocation of shared water resources was presented using a combination of bankruptcy concepts and asymmetric Nash bargaining....
متن کاملBargaining and the value of money
Search models of monetary exchange have typically relied on Nash (1950) bargaining, or strategic games that yield an equivalent outcome, to determine the terms of trade. By considering alternative axiomatic bargaining solutions in a simple search model with divisible money, we show how this choice matters for important results such as the ability of the optimal monetary policy to generate an ef...
متن کاملBargaining in Monetary Economies.∗
Search models of monetary exchange have typically relied on Nash (1950) bargaining, or strategic games that yield an equivalent outcome, to determine the terms of trade. By considering alternative axiomatic bargaining solutions in a simple search model with divisible money, we show how this choice matters for important results such as the ability of the optimal monetary policy to generate an ef...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید
ثبت ناماگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید
ورودعنوان ژورنال:
- Social Networks
دوره 28 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2006